Edgewise vs Faro As-Built

Discuss ClearEdge3D software here.
Post Reply
jtzambrano22
I have made <0 posts
I have made <0 posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2022 5:56 pm
Full Name: Jt Zambrano
Company Details: Commercial Design Build
Company Position Title: Architectural Associate
Country: United States
Linkedin Profile: Yes
Has thanked: 5 times

Edgewise vs Faro As-Built

Post by jtzambrano22 »

I have recently been looking for Scan to BIM software to save some time on modeling large industrial factories post scan and was pointed in the direction of Edgewise. The real deliverable I am looking for is getting piping, duct work and structural members modeled without having to measure every single little detail in Recap. I have done the trial and was pretty impressed aside from a whole lot of false positive pipes (more than likely beginners error on my part) but I haven't been able to find a whole lot when it comes to comparing it against the Faro As-Built software. I spoke with both an Edgewise rep and our current Faro rep and neither were able to really give me a good answer on how one stacks up against the other so I was hoping to get some feed back from the forum by people who have actually used either of these.
pipingdesigner
I have made 20-30 posts
I have made 20-30 posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2021 5:13 pm
1
Full Name: Paul Bowers
Company Details: Society of Piping Engineers and Designer
Company Position Title: President
Country: Canada
Linkedin Profile: Yes
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Edgewise vs Faro As-Built

Post by pipingdesigner »

It's unfortunate but not surprising that there's no independant third party that tests software like this and posts unbiased reviews.

I'm also guessing that successful workflows might be considered proprietary knowledge by some companies.
gordonired
I have made 100> posts
I have made 100> posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:27 pm
5
Full Name: Gordon
Company Details: Kaidak Energy Services
Company Position Title: Innovation Lead
Country: Canada
Linkedin Profile: Yes
Location: Alberta
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Edgewise vs Faro As-Built

Post by gordonired »

I can't really comment on Edgewise, I last trialed their software in 2018/2019 I believe. We use as-built here, and it is only really useful for a few things. The pipe extraction is pretty good, and I'd say it gives satisfactory results down to 1" pipe. It also can fit planes pretty well. That is the extent to which I use it.

We model our piping in different software, and only use those extracted pipes as rough "guides" to get our model near to where it needs to be. It exports as a .dxf and lines up with our point clouds, scales nicely etc. I use the stand alone version, called as-built modeler. The autocad plugin was good, but it had lots of features we didn't use, and it wasn't worth paying for autocad, when the standalone did what we needed just fine.

All in all, I would maybe use either of these as a place to get started on your model, and the rest is very manual and tedious. Pipes are easy, it's flanges and fittings and as-built horrors that make modelling difficult, and that require that human touch still.
surveypm
I have made 60-70 posts
I have made 60-70 posts
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 5:31 pm
7
Full Name: Tom Elbich
Company Details: Private
Company Position Title: Self
Country: USA
Linkedin Profile: No
Location: USA
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Edgewise vs Faro As-Built

Post by surveypm »

I haven't used Edgewise but have used As-built and As-built Modeler. I mostly agree with Gordon's use (cylinders and planes) and findings. However, I have extracted some structural commercial shapes using As-built. I've used it on manufacturing facilities rather than office buildings. I think for office buildings it could work well. In factories, getting really good scans is imperative, otherwise the matching can go awry. Often columns in factories have conduit and/or pipes on them which limits where you can get a clean area to match. Slicing method in As-built is okay but you have to be rally close on column with objects attached.
I'm not fond of having to use Recap files in AutoCAD. I liked the VirtuSurv Faro had which used the fls files directly imported although it had no real automation. I only use it for certain functions like Gordon and not a whole factory. I don't know anyone who does. On projects where a third party modeled a whole factory building they used Rhino but I don't know their methodology.
Good luck, maybe others have some thoughts.
User avatar
Dave Andrews
V.I.P Member
V.I.P Member
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:58 pm
10
Full Name: Dave Andrews
Company Details: R.E. Warner Associates Inc.
Company Position Title: 3d Scanning Coordinator
Country: USA
Linkedin Profile: Yes
Location: Canton, Ohio
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Contact:

Re: Edgewise vs Faro As-Built

Post by Dave Andrews »

I have both. Edgewise I feel is faster overall to use, its not AutoCAD. When I am using edgewise it is typically for an area of a plant or a column line of a plant. So I model the piping myself which is much faster and less stuff you do not need throughout the project. The duct work is so-so, the insulated stuff is very difficult to deal with which is understandable. Structural is great, especially if you have an idea of the sizes, then it is much faster.
"The harder you work, the harder it is to surrender."
Woody Hayes
melshy
V.I.P Member
V.I.P Member
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2017 5:48 pm
5
Full Name: Duy Nguyen
Company Details: Baezeni VietNam
Company Position Title: Baezeni VietNam
Country: Vietnam
Skype Name: duy_bz
Linkedin Profile: No
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Edgewise vs Faro As-Built

Post by melshy »

I tried both and recomment Faro if you use Revit, Autocad. If plantID Edgewise
Sullivan132
I have made <0 posts
I have made <0 posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2022 12:10 pm
Full Name: Sullivan Meyer
Company Details: Accuscan
Company Position Title: Manager
Country: France
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Edgewise vs Faro As-Built

Post by Sullivan132 »

Hello to all,

I also recommend Faro. I find it more convenient to use.
Post Reply

Return to “ClearEdge3D”