Survey Control Methods
-
- I have made 40-50 posts
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 5:05 pm
- 4
- Full Name: Charles
- Company Details: DFC
- Company Position Title: Principal
- Country: USA
- Linkedin Profile: No
Survey Control Methods
Hello All-
I currently use an S70 and Scene and am interested in adding some survey control with a total station. I am looking for some guidance on best practices for adding survey control to my workflow.
When adding survey control, what are you normal shooting? Reflector-less to a checkerboard? Reflector-less to a sphere? Adding a PK nail and setting CP then adding a target on top?
Does anyone have any video or manual resources that may be able to help?
Thanks!
I currently use an S70 and Scene and am interested in adding some survey control with a total station. I am looking for some guidance on best practices for adding survey control to my workflow.
When adding survey control, what are you normal shooting? Reflector-less to a checkerboard? Reflector-less to a sphere? Adding a PK nail and setting CP then adding a target on top?
Does anyone have any video or manual resources that may be able to help?
Thanks!
- Dave Andrews
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:58 pm
- 11
- Full Name: Dave Andrews
- Company Details: R.E. Warner Associates Inc.
- Company Position Title: 3d Scanning Coordinator
- Country: USA
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Location: Canton, Ohio
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
- Contact:
Re: Survey Control Methods
I use Faro, this is how I go about survey control.
I do shoot checker target reflectorless. I use them for column centerlines and elevation, not for primary control.
I also use spheres over PK nails on a tribrach.
Mostly for spheres, I use a -30 seco prism with a Kopo Sphere on top. The tribrach is fairly expensive and I believe the most accurate on the market. Once it is level you can shoot the prism with a negative rod height to the center of the sphere. Nice easy export to excel and straight into Scene with no extra work.
I do shoot checker target reflectorless. I use them for column centerlines and elevation, not for primary control.
I also use spheres over PK nails on a tribrach.
Mostly for spheres, I use a -30 seco prism with a Kopo Sphere on top. The tribrach is fairly expensive and I believe the most accurate on the market. Once it is level you can shoot the prism with a negative rod height to the center of the sphere. Nice easy export to excel and straight into Scene with no extra work.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"The harder you work, the harder it is to surrender."
Woody Hayes
Woody Hayes
- landmeterbeuckx
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 1615
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 5:19 pm
- 11
- Full Name: Lieven Beuckx
- Company Details: Studiebureau Beuckx
- Company Position Title: Owner
- Country: Belgium
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Has thanked: 183 times
- Been thanked: 548 times
Re: Survey Control Methods
Use this setup : spheres replaced by a prism which shows the center of the sphere. Adapter in tribach.
This is more secure then setup above where errors are easily made with calcs.
https://shop.laserscanning-europe.com/M ... Sphere-Set
https://shop.laserscanning-europe.com/T ... n-sphere_1
But to remind you : running a total station around a building isn't as straightforward as pushung buttons on a scanner. There is a special breed for those to operate which are called "A Surveyor". Get in contact with one and see what would be best in your workflows.
This is more secure then setup above where errors are easily made with calcs.
https://shop.laserscanning-europe.com/M ... Sphere-Set
https://shop.laserscanning-europe.com/T ... n-sphere_1
But to remind you : running a total station around a building isn't as straightforward as pushung buttons on a scanner. There is a special breed for those to operate which are called "A Surveyor". Get in contact with one and see what would be best in your workflows.
- Tanguy Nédélec
- I have made 90-100 posts
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 3:15 pm
- 8
- Full Name: NEDELEC Tanguy
- Company Details: Prigent et Associes
- Company Position Title: Surveyor - nooks and crannies explorer
- Country: France
- Linkedin Profile: No
- Location: Dinan
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Survey Control Methods
A mix of all of those, depending of what's possible or most convenient.charlesdab wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:06 pm Reflector-less to a checkerboard? Reflector-less to a sphere? Adding a PK nail and setting CP then adding a target on top?
Lately I've been using these: https://shop.laserscanning-europe.com/3 ... -100-piece more and more, in combination with this prism: https://shop.laserscanning-europe.com/M ... Sphere-Set.
Occasionally, these: https://shop.laserscanning-europe.com/S ... ut-support. Bubble them over a nail with a simple rod level. They're a bit cumbersome, but not as much as a full tripod+tribrach, especially when you need several of them at the same time for a single scan.
(Might I add that I'm not affiliated to laserscanning-europe . There are other shops as well.)
- landmeterbeuckx
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 1615
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 5:19 pm
- 11
- Full Name: Lieven Beuckx
- Company Details: Studiebureau Beuckx
- Company Position Title: Owner
- Country: Belgium
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Has thanked: 183 times
- Been thanked: 548 times
Re: Survey Control Methods
Those are only good to place your spheres above ground. They can be placed everywhere but don't ever use them for control. After a few times usage they get wobbly and the disc comes loose.tengui wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 10:39 amOccasionally, these: https://shop.laserscanning-europe.com/S ... ut-support. Bubble them over a nail with a simple rod level. They're a bit cumbersome, but not as much as a full tripod+tribrach, especially when you need several of them at the same time for a single scan.charlesdab wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 11:06 pm Reflector-less to a checkerboard? Reflector-less to a sphere? Adding a PK nail and setting CP then adding a target on top?
-
- I have made 40-50 posts
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 5:05 pm
- 4
- Full Name: Charles
- Company Details: DFC
- Company Position Title: Principal
- Country: USA
- Linkedin Profile: No
Re: Survey Control Methods
These are all great tips. Thank you.
Luckily my use case is not so tight that I feel like I need to engage a surveyor. Since I have direct line of sight to all points from one total station location, I think I should be OK.
All I want to do is reference my scans to the local coordinate system. It seems like total station with survey control may be my best bet on these projects. Without that I'd be aligning it manually.
Luckily my use case is not so tight that I feel like I need to engage a surveyor. Since I have direct line of sight to all points from one total station location, I think I should be OK.
All I want to do is reference my scans to the local coordinate system. It seems like total station with survey control may be my best bet on these projects. Without that I'd be aligning it manually.
- LPaulCook
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 9:42 pm
- 8
- Full Name: L Paul Cook
- Company Details: Land surveyor doing LiDAR
- Company Position Title: President
- Country: United States
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Location: Santa Barbara CA
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
- Contact:
Re: Survey Control Methods
I use checkard targets and duct tape them over one of my control points I shot in using my total station or taped to a flat surface and shot in with my total station using the reflectorless setting. I try to get all shot in from the same station but that's not always possible. This method is plenty accurate for all my work in building scanning and Topographical surveys. I am a land surveyor so I have the equipment anyway.
L. Paul Cook, PLS
www.LPC3D.com
www.LPC3D.com
-
- I have made 90-100 posts
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:27 pm
- 6
- Full Name: Mika Jahkola
- Company Details: Myymore Oy
- Company Position Title: Managing Director
- Country: Finland
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Location: Espoo, Finland
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
- Contact:
Re: Survey Control Methods
When you measure checkerboard targets with a total station, your targets will generally not be perpendicular to the line of sight, but at varying angles.
The laser spot of the total station has some finite size and if it hits the target at a large angle of incidence, the spot could grow quite large and have an irregular shape.
A black and white checkerboard target returns a much stronger signal from the white part than the black part. This is not a problem as long as the target is looking straight at you, but if it is angled, the distance measurement may go wrong because the white part tends to dominate the result.
In your experience, at what angles of incidence can you still measure checkerboard targets reliably, and how do you mitigate any errors that arise?
The laser spot of the total station has some finite size and if it hits the target at a large angle of incidence, the spot could grow quite large and have an irregular shape.
A black and white checkerboard target returns a much stronger signal from the white part than the black part. This is not a problem as long as the target is looking straight at you, but if it is angled, the distance measurement may go wrong because the white part tends to dominate the result.
In your experience, at what angles of incidence can you still measure checkerboard targets reliably, and how do you mitigate any errors that arise?
- LPaulCook
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 9:42 pm
- 8
- Full Name: L Paul Cook
- Company Details: Land surveyor doing LiDAR
- Company Position Title: President
- Country: United States
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Location: Santa Barbara CA
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
- Contact:
Re: Survey Control Methods
I use a Leica TS16 robotic 1" instrument. They have a very small laser dot, unlike some others. Nevertheless I agree that the target should be very close to perpendicular to the line of sight.
If that can not be achieved the run a traverse to another position that is in the correct relationship to the target. Then close your traverse to be sure that traverse is correct and within your allowable accuracy tolerance.
Shooting topography can be much looser than Shooting a factory so set your accuracy standards accordingly.
If that can not be achieved the run a traverse to another position that is in the correct relationship to the target. Then close your traverse to be sure that traverse is correct and within your allowable accuracy tolerance.
Shooting topography can be much looser than Shooting a factory so set your accuracy standards accordingly.
L. Paul Cook, PLS
www.LPC3D.com
www.LPC3D.com
- jcoco3
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1724
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:43 pm
- 12
- Full Name: Jonathan Coco
- Company Details: Consultant
- Company Position Title: Owner
- Country: USA
- Linkedin Profile: No
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 157 times
Re: Survey Control Methods
Considering the concerns expressed over the size of a total station's beam size, this seems like something relevant to add to the conversation:
viewtopic.php?p=84584#p84584
I second the concern about reflector-less shots, which is not to say they cannot be accurate with the right knowledge and practice.
viewtopic.php?p=84584#p84584
I second the concern about reflector-less shots, which is not to say they cannot be accurate with the right knowledge and practice.