HDR TEST WITH FARO S350 SCANNER
- LPaulCook
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 9:42 pm
- 8
- Full Name: L Paul Cook
- Company Details: Land surveyor doing LiDAR
- Company Position Title: President
- Country: United States
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Location: Santa Barbara CA
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
- Contact:
HDR TEST WITH FARO S350 SCANNER
I did an indoor test with my S350 scanner using the various HDR photo settings, I did the same scan using each setting i.e. 1 exposure, 2 exposures, 3 etc... here's the results. Look at the details in the window areas and outside thru the window. The HDR make a huge improvement over just one exposure. The last two images are using the Night setting which I was not very happy with at all.... night 1 exposure and night 5 exposures.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
L. Paul Cook, PLS
www.LPC3D.com
www.LPC3D.com
-
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2018 10:20 am
- 5
- Full Name: Brad
- Company Details: 3d scan
- Company Position Title: Guru
- Country: Canada
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Location: Van
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: HDR TEST WITH FARO S350 SCANNER
Number 5 is great.
Also love the wall paper [emoji3526][emoji108]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also love the wall paper [emoji3526][emoji108]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- I have made 10-20 posts
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:42 pm
- 5
- Full Name: Julien Crippa
- Company Details: Consultco
- Company Position Title: 3d Scanner technician
- Country: Canada
Re: HDR TEST WITH FARO S350 SCANNER
Thanks for your feedback.
For my experience 1x and 2x is useless. But sometimes I get bad collage results with HDR and, if zoom-details are important, I prefer a partially overexposed photo (if the area overexposed is not important.
What about the new features that takes photos rapidly?
For my experience 1x and 2x is useless. But sometimes I get bad collage results with HDR and, if zoom-details are important, I prefer a partially overexposed photo (if the area overexposed is not important.
What about the new features that takes photos rapidly?