Leica BLK2Go

Discuss all BLK2GO related products here
Post Reply
User avatar
blazaj
V.I.P Member
V.I.P Member
Posts: 645
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:07 pm
Full Name: Jiri Blazek
Company Details: BW precision systems sro
Company Position Title: Managing Director
Country: Czech Republic
Linkedin Profile: No
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Leica BLK2Go

Post by blazaj »

The sample data doesn't look too bad to me at a first glance. I like the colour and it seems not to have that much noise. I'm not Geoslam user I cannot compare. It is not level, but I guess it can't be achieved by the instrument alone?
Clipboard03.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
blazaj
V.I.P Member
V.I.P Member
Posts: 645
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:07 pm
Full Name: Jiri Blazek
Company Details: BW precision systems sro
Company Position Title: Managing Director
Country: Czech Republic
Linkedin Profile: No
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Leica BLK2Go

Post by blazaj »

..any chance to have the same space scanned and published as a sample dataset with BLK360 and RTC360??

GeorgSchroth
I have made 30-40 posts
I have made 30-40 posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2019 11:05 am
Full Name: Georg Schroth
Company Details: NavVis
Company Position Title: Managing Director
Country: Germany
Linkedin Profile: Yes
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Leica BLK2Go

Post by GeorgSchroth »

I would be very interested to understand how everybody here is evaluating the quality of a point cloud.
Since there are quite a few ways to look at a point cloud (absolute & relative accuracy, resolution of details (what size of objects can I model), coloring to recognize non-geometric features, spray points on edges, noise level), I would like to better understand what is most important for you and your business and what you check out first.

Especially for mobile mapping devices the drift error (how does the error grow over the distance in a long corridor) is quite important, I assume?

User avatar
landmeterbeuckx
V.I.P Member
V.I.P Member
Posts: 939
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 5:19 pm
Full Name: Lieven Beuckx
Company Details: Studiebureau Beuckx
Company Position Title: Owner
Country: Belgium
Linkedin Profile: Yes
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Leica BLK2Go

Post by landmeterbeuckx »

I went to a vip event in Brussels yesterday where the Blk2go was presented. I'm not in the Leica space and have some reservations about their productline and marketing strategies but am intriged about this blk2go so i went.

After the regular chitchat we got an introduction where this device stands in the other mobile mapping solutions. It was clearly stated that the device is not a replacement for other scanner solutions but an add-on and for specific use the perfect solution.

Then there was a demo how it works and how you start a measurement from scratch with the connection of a phone to track progres. This was very fluent and in comparison with a geoslam a fast approach. Also you only need to hold one device without cabling and a rucksack makes it very handy. Thet demonstrated some features as a picture in HD as you walk to take details. One button operation is definitely the way to go, no settings only the ring light to indicate what is happening. The operator went into some rooms (lobby of a hotel chain) and it tracked fine.

The data taken was not shown on pc but some exemples of data taken from the blk2go compared with rtc360 data of 2 houses, a graveyard, a park with a building and a sports complex with lots of dressing rooms.

The differences in distances where shown and for the interior of the houses it was max 2cm from front to back. Outside with lots of references around it went to a couple of cm's but the situation of the park had some differences outside of 10cm. They did show the times taken with blk2go and the rtc and it was a factor 5 till 10.

Everyone who knows pointcloud data expects points to be seen, with the blk2go there were stripes instead of points but the rooms were good to recognize. They also showed which lod could be generated from this data and it was said lod300 but i'm thinking moire of lod250.

It looks like a good device for indoors and the accuracy of say 2cm to be kept in mind. For outside use i would use this data maybe for landscaping purposes but not compared with stuff done from the known static scanners.

There will be some more changes in software they said because now you do the measurement and it comes out the instrument (wifi or ucb-c) as is. Nop changes or corrections to be made, will change in the future they said.

All in all a good product for its use but the pricetag is high, especially if like me you have no other Leica software. I also asked if it would be possible to extract for exemple the pano pics for use in a different virtual tour software but they or didn't know or didn't want to say it wasn't possible.

Had some other contacts as weel so all in all a good afternoon spent.
LSBbvba
Surveying services - 3D Laserscanning
Tel : +32477753126
www.lsbbvba.be
[email protected]

designmule
I have made 100> posts
I have made 100> posts
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2018 4:25 pm
Full Name: Matt McDonald
Company Details: BRR Architecture
Company Position Title: Associate
Country: United States
Linkedin Profile: No
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Leica BLK2Go

Post by designmule »

Thanks for the detailed write up Lieven. BLK2Go has struck me as a tool (albeit an expensive one) in a tool kit, which your experience seems to reinforce.

This question isn't directed toward you but I wonder how it handles metal? We scan a lot of commercial kitchens and have realized that the BLK360 returns very little data from the stainless steel surfaces. RTC360 & Faro S series do well. BLK2Go uses (I believe) the same wavelength laser as the BLK360 so I have to guess that it performs similarly to the BLK360 but I'd like to know. These kitchens (and coolers/freezers) take a long time to scan using a terrestrial scanner but do offer a lot of closed loop opportunities which are particularly beneficial or necessary for SLAM solutions.

User avatar
landmeterbeuckx
V.I.P Member
V.I.P Member
Posts: 939
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 5:19 pm
Full Name: Lieven Beuckx
Company Details: Studiebureau Beuckx
Company Position Title: Owner
Country: Belgium
Linkedin Profile: Yes
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Leica BLK2Go

Post by landmeterbeuckx »

designmule wrote:
Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:16 am

This question isn't directed toward you but I wonder how it handles metal? We scan a lot of commercial kitchens and have realized that the BLK360 returns very little data from the stainless steel surfaces. RTC360 & Faro S series do well. BLK2Go uses (I believe) the same wavelength laser as the BLK360 so I have to guess that it performs similarly to the BLK360 but I'd like to know. These kitchens (and coolers/freezers) take a long time to scan using a terrestrial scanner but do offer a lot of closed loop opportunities which are particularly beneficial or necessary for SLAM solutions.
I wouldn't know. All i've seen and the test were in classic environements without a lot of shiny objects. In your case i would ask a rep to come out to a kitchen and do a demo there with the results on a laptop for you to evaluate.
LSBbvba
Surveying services - 3D Laserscanning
Tel : +32477753126
www.lsbbvba.be
[email protected]

Oxbow
V.I.P Member
V.I.P Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:07 pm
Full Name: Eric Bergholz
Company Details: Laserscanning Europe
Company Position Title: CEO
Country: Germany
Skype Name: eboxbow
Linkedin Profile: Yes
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Leica BLK2Go

Post by Oxbow »

blazaj wrote:
Tue Jan 21, 2020 10:51 am
The sample data doesn't look too bad to me at a first glance. I like the colour and it seems not to have that much noise. I'm not Geoslam user I cannot compare. It is not level, but I guess it can't be achieved by the instrument alone?

Clipboard03.jpg
ohh, looks that pointcab software works also well with BLK2GO data.

User avatar
pburrows145
V.I.P Member
V.I.P Member
Posts: 2678
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:16 am
Full Name: Paul Burrows
Company Details: Leica Geosystems Europe
Company Position Title: Scanning Solutions Manager - Europe
Country: UK
Linkedin Profile: Yes
Location: UK
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Leica BLK2Go

Post by pburrows145 »


User avatar
smacl
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 596
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 5:12 pm
Full Name: Shane MacLaughlin
Company Details: Atlas Computers Ltd
Company Position Title: Managing Director
Country: Ireland
Linkedin Profile: Yes
Location: Ireland
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 58 times
Contact:

Re: Leica BLK2Go

Post by smacl »

blazaj wrote:
Tue Jan 21, 2020 10:51 am
The sample data doesn't look too bad to me at a first glance. I like the colour and it seems not to have that much noise. I'm not Geoslam user I cannot compare. It is not level, but I guess it can't be achieved by the instrument alone?

Clipboard03.jpg
I just had a first look at the sample BLK2Go data yesterday and put together a short article on it on LinkedIn here; https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/first-im ... claughlin/ Comparing it to some similar ZEB Revo data the noise levels seem lower, with about 25mm of range on a flat wall leading to good automated section extraction fitting lines and arcs at 10mm tolerance (we use 1-2mm on P40 by comparison and 12-15mm on ZEB Revo).

A couple of questions for Paul Burrows or anyone else with an inside track on Leica;
  • Can the registration be used in conjunction with targets or any other form of external control to constrain absolute accuracy?
  • Does the unit have to be held vertically? Parallel vertical scan profile lines lead to poor point distribution for both horizontal and vertical sections, 45 degrees would give much better point distribution for these purposes and allow for finer sections.
  • Can the oriented images be provided with data, either embedded in the E57 or better still as external files in the same format as the Pegasus back-back?
I captured some video here which may be of interest, which looks at the BLK2Go point-cloud in more gnarly up close detail rather than the more aesthetically appealing zoomed out view. While it looks a bit noisy, I think the data is really good for this type of SLAM solution. Hoping to get some real world user data shortly to get a more in-depth feel for this.


youtu.be/SXF_bgCuB94

Post Reply

Return to “Leica BLK2GO”